|
Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Diesels and turbodiesels require lower RPMs to achieve excellent daily driveability. Due to the fact that most diesel engines redline in the 4K-4.5K range, much of the broad, flat torque curve of a diesel engine is at considerably lower RPMs. As a point of reference, my 6.0 Powerstroke in my Ford Excursion hits maximum torque (560 ft/lb) at right around 2,000 RPM. Remember, also, that the most important factor of what determines excellent driveability and performance is the so-called "area under the curve" of a basic horsepower and torque chart. Peak HP and peak TQ don't mean a lot if it is a narrow band at the highest RPM, with sharp dropoffs on either side. Again to cite my Powerstroke, it makes 400 ft/lb at 1,000 RPM (idles at about 700 RPM), makes 500 ft/lb at 1,500 RPM, and doesn't drop below 500 ft/lb again (after peaking right around 2,000 RPM) until the engine hits about 3,500 RPM. Given that it redlines at 4,000 RPM, that's a pretty broad torque curve, as roughly 50% of the useable engine rev range is at or above 500 ft/lb. As anecdotal evidence, on my Excursion, at 55 MPH, I can toe in more throttle and rather comfortably accelerate to 70 MPH quickly without downshifting to a lower (4th) gear. On a 5-speed transmission, that's a considerable accomplishment. I can only wonder at what my truck would drive like with a 7-speed or 8-speed transmission as one finds in most luxury automakers cars now. More anecdotal evidence: I loaded up the wife's X5 (2007 X5 4.8i) with a full load of camping gear and drove it almost 400 miles to my camping destination. It was the two of us, so there was a LOT of stuff (wife can't camp light LOL), and the X5 did OKAY, but there was a considerable dropoff in performance, especially going up any grade at all. The car lugged a lot, and downshifted frequently. My Excursion did the same trip, this time with 2 adults, two children, and two infants, with an even larger amount of stuff (thanks to the presence of children), and the truck barely seemed to "notice" the additional weight. Granted, there is a marked difference in curb weight between a 4,000 lb X5 and an 8,000 lb Excursion, but the added few hundred pounds of gear and food didn't slow me down at all. In fact, I still averaged 23+ MPG on highway and rural roads during both legs of the trip in my Excursion. The point to the discussion is, if you want a racecar, or something that drives more like a sports car, a factory tuned diesel isn't for you. Stick with petrol. But if you want something that can pull loads, trailers, full cabins, or just give you civilized street manners without requiring lots of throttle to get you around town, the diesel is the way to go. Now that I drive a diesel full-time, I can't imagine driving anything else.
__________________
2007 BMW X5 4.8i - Sport Package, Wife's Car 2001 BMW 325i - My Car. 2005 Ford Excursion Limited 4x4, 6.0 Powerstroke Diesel. My first "grown up" car. |
Sponsored Links | |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
My E53 gasser six with a 6 spd stick lacks the torque to be an ideal towing vehicle. I have towed approximately 4500-4800 lbs and have to do a lot of downshifting to 4th [even 3d] on rolling terrain. My experience with Ford trucks, supposedly 'comparably' powered [V-10 gasser vis. 7.3L V-8 diesel] was no comparison: the diesel's torque makes all the difference. I would 'hitch up' the diesel and be happy .....
__________________
2006 X5 3.0 6-spd w/Evo UUC ssk sport/premium pkgs born Valentine's Day, 2006. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The racing cyclist can spin at 7000. He has a certain torque, and so can push a given gear. The heavier cyclist can spin at 5000, but likes a lower cadence. He has a narrower range of efficient cadences. He can push a bigger gear at those lower cadences. But at the end of the day, the racing cyclist can do more work per unit of time. That is all hp is, work over time. A given weight, raised a given distance, in a given time. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Thought it may help to use a truer analogy.
Quote:
Another guy, on a six speed bike. He can pedal up to 5000, but develops peak torque at 1700. He can leg press 425 at the gym. The two of them are put on identical weight bikes with trailers that can carry variable weights. They are asked to ride up the same hill, to see what is the maximum total weight they can get to the top in one minute, using whatever gear they like. The skinny guy gets 300 lbs to the top. The other guy gets 265 lbs to the top. They are equally tired and sweaty. That is a better analogy for power, and it matches the engine ratings. And the difference continues with more weight, ie larger trailers. Heavy guy is proportionally slower.
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It is important to compare turbocharged engines with other turbocharged engines. The N57 diesel is listed as having full torque available from 1750 to 3000 rpm, a 1250 rpm band. The N55 gasoline engine is listed as having full torque available from 1200 to 5000 rpm, a 3800 rpm band, ie 3 times as wide. While the N57 has greater peak torque, which would you describe as having more drivability/flexibility? With my 535i with a 6MT, I could pull away in 1st and then shift 3-5, or pull away in second and shift 4-6. Or just go 1-4. It would have out towed my former diesels if I could have put a hitch on it.
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Another interesting fact.
Take a look at the effect that added weight and wind resistance take on gasoline and diesel engines when it comes to acceleration: 2011 335i: 4.9s 0-60mph. Curb weight: 3814 lbs 2011 X5 35i: 6.5s 0-60 mph. Curb weight: 4960 lbs (+1,146 lbs, or +23%) That's 25% reduction in acceleration at 23% increase in curb weight. A straight line in a chart. 2011 335d: 5.7s 0-60mph. Curb weight: 3825 lbs. 2011 X5 35d: 6.9s 0-60mph. Curb weight: 5192 (+1,367 lbs, or 26 %) That's only 17% reduction in acceleration at 26% increase in curb weight. Source: Car&Driver, Edmunds. Shall we see projected acceleration given additional 6000 towed lbs? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I don't really know if I've ever seen a petrol engine with 80+% torque available for that much of the rev range. If it is, indeed, the case with the N55, that's quite an impressive accomplishment, and BMW deserves some accolades for designing such an easily daily driver-friendly engine.
__________________
2007 BMW X5 4.8i - Sport Package, Wife's Car 2001 BMW 325i - My Car. 2005 Ford Excursion Limited 4x4, 6.0 Powerstroke Diesel. My first "grown up" car. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I did enjoy the mental image of a 535i towing a diesel, that made me chuckle.
__________________
2007 BMW X5 4.8i - Sport Package, Wife's Car 2001 BMW 325i - My Car. 2005 Ford Excursion Limited 4x4, 6.0 Powerstroke Diesel. My first "grown up" car. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://www.1addicts.com/forums/attac...1&d=1270074298
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
|